College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

Sign of the times

Iconic radio tower to come down

By Vivian Ho

Print this article

Published: Monday, November 24, 2008

Updated: Monday, November 24, 2008

com

Isabel Slepoy

COM plans to remove the radio tower this upcoming Saturday.

The College of Communication is ready to remove some of its past this weekend as workers prepare to take down the more than 50-year-old radio tower atop its roof.

It speaks of old technology,” COM Dean Tom Fiedler said. “It hasn’t been used in 30 years. I think it sends the wrong message of where we want to go as a college. In 2008, radio is old, the technology of our grandfathers.”

Fiedler said the decision to remove of the tower had been in the works for a while, but was officially made just a few days ago. Fliers around COM ask students and faculty what they would like to see in place of the tower.

Journalism professor Anne Donohue, the academic director for the student-run radio station WTBU, said she thinks the radio tower is antiquated.

“It’s an artifact of a bygone era,” she said. “We don’t use it for distributing any audio. It’s never worked for the radio station, and it’s never been a very pretty thing to look at it. It’s ugly.” 

The radio tower was originally for WBUR, which was broadcast from the top floor of COM in the late 1950s, according to bostonradio.org. WBUR is now broadcast from 890 Commonwealth Ave.

WTBU began webcasting in 2000 and, before that, used carrier current, which broadcasts radio using the cables that go up and down elevator shafts, Donohue said.

WTBU Music Director Jen Brown said she was disappointed to find that the station did not actually have its own signal on campus. She said the radio tower was “deceptive.”

“It represents absolutely nothing,” Brown, a COM junior, said. “It’s a huge useless tower of metal.

“COM needs to push more for an Internet station, giving us a visible spot in the front of the COM building, with a big window where people can see us broadcasting,” she said.

Donohue said she, too, wants a “prominent, storefront window,” but would like for an entirely new COM building to go along with it.

“If we’re not building a new building, at least get the website for the radio station out in the front of the building,” she said.

Fiedler said he wants to get a sign stating, “COM,” to replace the tower for the time being, but hopes to get a Jumbotron in the future, following the example set by schools like the Beijing Film Academy.

The tower’s removal does not interfere with President Robert Brown’s construction freeze, because workers will not actually be building anything, Fiedler said. 

“I want to take COM into the future,” he said. “I’m conscious more about where we are in this continuum of communication in general, changing and being transformed. We always want to be leaning forward.”

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

20 comments

Genius Man
Tue Dec 2 2008 14:09
Yeah, why not just turn it into a radio broadcast signal again. Too expensive?
BUCOM83
Mon Dec 1 2008 21:32
As a former Freep columnist and a TBU morning person in the late 70's, early 80's, what Dean Fiedler isn't realizing is that with every problem is an opportunity. Totally agree that there is a place for new technology there. Cell phone - Wi-Max, heck, rent space to the BU, MBTA or Boston police to put an antenna up there. How about a windmill? Lease it to an LPTV provider, or, perish the thought, get WTBU finally over the air. 100 watts is plenty. Do all of those things - there's plenty of room. If the pirates in Dorchester can do it, why can't BU? Turn a dead asset into a revenue stream Dean!
Eric
Mon Dec 1 2008 05:58
The tower represents radio. Radio makes your cell phone and wi-fi work. If normal zoning rules apply, odds are the existing tower cannot be rebuilt, even if it is needed by a future need that is unforseen now.

There is no assurance Internet or cell phone bandwidth will acommodate the function of broadcasting a a program to hundereds of thousands of moving listeners.

I think the fate of something that has existed for fifty years should be considered over a period of time that extends beyond the influence of a few indivuduals or the mood of one period of time.

Mario Hieb, P.E.
Sat Nov 29 2008 14:18
Dean Fielder should climb down from the ivy covered, ivory tower and see what's going on in the real world. Radio is not obsolete; I believe that radio is a $20 billion a year industry in the U.S. It is also listened to by 99.5% of the U.S. population each week. We have a wonderful public radio service in the U.S. called NPR which uses this ancient technology.

As for the tower being antiquated, "vertical real-estate" is at an all time high in value. If Professor Donohue wants to be "progressive," use the tower to distribute Wi-FI, Wi-Max and other new technologies. Cell phone companies will also pay you a small fortune in rent for tower space.

Regarding the comments that it is an eye-sore, the same was thought of the Eiffel Tower in Paris, and it was nearly demolished. Many radio towers, such as Mt. Sutro in San Francisco, have become architectural landmarks.

BTW Dean Fielder; regarding your feeling that radio speaks for "old technology," yes radio waves are old technology. Electromagnetic fields (radio waves) are one of the four fundamental forces in nature and have existed since time began and before matter was formed. The mathematical equations which describe radio waves, Maxwell's Equations, are the foundation of all electrical engineering and 1/4 of the world's economy. The work of Maxwell inspired Einstein to do his work on relativity.

Instead of tearing down this tower, you should be dedicating it as a monument to science and culture. You should place a plaque below it describing the scientific, historical, cultural and sociological importance of radio waves in our world. Perhaps your students might be inspired each time they saw it.

Ron D, Broadcast Engineer
Thu Nov 27 2008 09:16
Another fine example of an overeducated moron. They're on every campus!
bigbear
Thu Nov 27 2008 02:01
That's funny because some colleges would fast and pray for a tower like that. Some people are so dumb they do not even realize what they have. Also, there are many colleges that are willing to spend big money to get off the inteenet and onto a real FM signal. Radio dead?!?! Only to those who cannot hack it in the industry.
flwfg
Mon Nov 24 2008 20:57
Why not use the tower for a couple or more cell phone transmitters, and MAKE money for the school??? I doubt radio will ever become obsolete... In a disaster, ,who covers it first and has it heard by most :RADIO...Sure beats the speed of a daily newspaper...
Fact-Checker
Mon Nov 24 2008 17:17
Invention of functional radio-wave transmitter: 1893.

Invention of functional printing press: 1493.

Print predates Radio by four hundred years, but Radio is the "old technology"?

Methinks the editor of the Miami Herald is a little biased, no?

Fact-Checker
Mon Nov 24 2008 17:10
Invention of functional radio-wave transmitter: 1893.

Invention of functional printing press: 1493.

Print predates Radio by four hundred years, but Radio is the "old technology"?

Methinks the editor of the Miami Herald is a little biased, no?

COM Alum
Mon Nov 24 2008 17:01
Fascinating that the new Dean of COM is calling radio "obsolete". As another poster noted, radio-wave technology is what connects cellular phones to their towers, GPS systems, and wireless laptop cards to their access points (yes, wi-fi is apparently "obsolete" technology).

It's a little amusing to see Dean Fiedler, former editor of a major print newspaper, referring to radio as "old technology", since the medium he built his career on predates the radio wave by a few hundred years (funny how print newspaper is struggling, while people still listen to radio in their cars every day).

I also wonder about the fiscal responsibility the Dean is showing in spending what must be many thousands of dollars to take down that radio tower right as the University is facing a wholesale budgetary belt-tightening. The money spent on that renovation could purchase new office air conditioning units for much of the building, something that's been needed for years. But I guess this project, along with the Dean's new office space (is that crown molding really necessary?), is just a prelude to what's in store for the college over the next few years. A bleak picture indeed.

BD 00
Mon Nov 24 2008 16:07
I have to laugh, and worry about the students COM has recruited...The attributed comments show a complete lack of vision, both going forward and looking back. "Study the past if you would define the future." –Confucius- Should we take down the CITGO sign, because that really has nothing to with CITGO or is an "eye sore". What about the USS Intrepid, or the lighthouses that dot the coast of most of New England. Shall we cast them off as rusting pieces of metal or outdated technology. If you have ever been to NYC's beautiful Grand Central Station, you should know that it was days away from demolition, an outdated relic whose destruction was sought for progess. Thankfully some forward looking historical minded groups knew better. The day will come when a jumbotron is outdated by a future technology, and its the wrecking ball to it, with no way to recapture the school's history. Its been eight years since I graduated BU, which I'm sure is a lifetime to most undergrads, but I am very sad to hear another piece of the BU I know is gone. At least Walter Brown Arena has been sparred the wrecking ball of progress. For now at least.
Michael Bragg
Mon Nov 24 2008 15:28
OK, so the tower is ungainly. It was, even in 1967-68 when I was there. But isn't it more appropriate to just leave it at that, and say "take down the eyesore"? It's not a symbol. It's old iron. For today's youth to disavow radio, is odd. What do you think runs your cell phone, your GPS...? Yes, Radio.
Your name
Mon Nov 24 2008 15:04
I find it ironic that the college of communications article displays a lack of communication...
BU alum
Mon Nov 24 2008 14:13
Has BU fixed the broken windows, window shades, and radiators in this building yet?
Mark Thompson '75
Mon Nov 24 2008 13:54
Well, sounds like we're halfway there....instead of a sign merely saying "COM," how about one saying ".com" instead?
Your name
Mon Nov 24 2008 13:43
To echo and build upon the other comments, the quality of the FreeP has gone down for a few years in a row, but that's not the purpose of this comment.

I think it is sad that COM is taking down a piece of its history. I am surprised to hear this out of Dean Fiedler, a COM alum, and Professor Donohue, for whom I have the utmost respect. I'm not surprised to hear it from a student, sadly. I think they need to promote WTBU and webcasting more too, but taking down the radio tower is completely unrelated to that. I am not sure what the point of a Jumbotron would be, but why not wait to take down the tower until the Jumbrotron or whatever is ready to be installed. A big sign that says "COM" seems much more pointless than a radio tower.

remove
Mon Nov 24 2008 11:21
Seriously. Who let the first sentence through?
Your name
Mon Nov 24 2008 11:21
I find it ironic that the college of communications article displays a lack of communication...
grumpy grad student
Mon Nov 24 2008 11:05
Please edit these articles before you send them to the student body as a whole. The first sentence is atrocious, and you also don't seem to know what carrier current broadcasting is.
Anonymous
Mon Nov 24 2008 10:59
Good topic, horrible writing. This is not the only DFP article that I have seen this year that has been riddled with errors and clearly shows lack of proofreading. The quality of the Freep has gone downhill this year. Proofread!






log out