College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

BU divided over first Israel Apartheid Week

Published: Tuesday, March 2, 2010

Updated: Tuesday, March 2, 2010

Students for Justice in Palestine, a pro-Palestine student group, kicked off Boston University’s first annual Israeli Apartheid Week on Monday to make their case to BU students that the Israeli treatment of Palestinians is comparable to apartheid in South Africa.

By holding the IAW week at BU, SJP members hope to encourage discussion of Palestinian’s human rights and raise awareness about the current Israeli-Palestinian conflict at Gaza.

According to apartheidweek.org, IAW is taking place in over 40 cities around the globe with a goal of “[educating] people about the nature of Israel as an apartheid system and [building] Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) campaigns as part of a growing global BDS movement.”

“SJP believes that while the Palestinian people must ultimately be able to decide their future in Palestine, certain key principles, grounded in international law, human rights and basic standards of justice, are fundamental to a just resolution of the plight of the Palestinians,” the group’s blog states.

Throughout the week, the group will screen films and host lectures at BU. They also have a table set up at George Sherman Union, where members will hand out fact sheets and information about events.

As part of IAW, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Professor Emeritus Noam Chomsky will address the conflict in a lecture at Jacob Sleeper Auditorium.

“As a Jew, I can get citizenship in Israel and not have to face unfair and unequal laws, not have to pass through checkpoints, not have to have my land stolen, have my house demolished, have my family evicted,” said Graduate School of Arts and Sciences student and SJP member Ian Chinich. “Whereas a Palestinian whose family had been living in Jaffa or Haifa but now live in a refugee camp cannot get citizenship.”

Benjamin Kalmanowicz, a School of Management freshman and member of BU’s Arab-Israeli Peace Alliance, said he believes the term apartheid is illegitimate.

“The word choice of this has to be very carefully examined,” he said. “It is an attempt to compare and show people who have no idea about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict that Israel is the evil part, but I think everybody can agree that both countries have a part in this conflict.”

The New Oxford American Dictionary defines apartheid as “a policy of segregation or discrimination on grounds of race.”

Kalmanowicz said IAW should be protested because it is wrongly comparing Israel to the formerly apartheid state of South Africa.

AIPA, founded in 2005, is another campus group dedicated to bringing peace in the Middle East. Their goal, according to their Facebook page, is to “educate students on the complex situation between the Israeli and Palestinian nations, show their commonalities and allow co-existence to thrive on a campus.”

AIPA doesn’t take a standpoint on IAW because the organization’s intention is to promote peace, not tension and separation, Kalmanowicz said.  

Some students are skeptical about the IAW’s intentions.

“Having this week is turning the campus into more of a battleground than any awareness booster,” said College of Arts and Sciences freshman Rachel Kessler.

Others said they believe it will help raise awareness.

“It’s a great opportunity to educate the public about an important issue and to clarify some misconceptions about the situation at hand between Israelis and Palestinians,” said College of General Studies freshman Sebastian Filgueira-Gomez.

SJP says IAW is important to have on college campuses because it is part of a global effort.

“The debate on this campus has been deliberately skewed to condemn the victim of occupation by the occupier,” Chinich said. “We are part of an international movement to change that.”

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

6 comments

Anonymous
Mon Mar 15 2010 13:21
It is time to create enciclopedia "How to blame Israel- for dummiesl"
Or "Idiots Guide or 101 ways to blame Israel"
Anonymous
Mon Mar 8 2010 11:16
Dear Boston University,

DO NOT EVER ASK ME TO DONATE TO YOU AGAIN. This article sickens me as a graduate of Boston University. As a free thinking member of the community at large, I believe it is important to discuss these issues but to devote a week to this is appalling. Last time I checked Noam Chomsky is a linguists professor and has no background on middle east politics. Alan Dershowitz for several years has challenged Chomsky to debate Israel's right to existence which is being denied by these false accusations of apartheid and discrimination against so-called 'Palestinians' in the West Bank. Chomsky has refused to debate Dershowitz in a public forum.

What's next Holocaust Denial Month hosted by Boston University?

Anonymous
Wed Mar 3 2010 23:12
The use of the term "Apartheid" is appropriate, though as Chomsky is right to say, in some ways, Israel is not as bad as the old South Africa, and in other ways, it is. The Jews are privileged within Israel given the unequal funding advantage they have over Israeli Arabs in the areas of educaition and social services. Furthermore, the requirement that Jewish Israelis serve in the military gives them an advantage over their Palestinian fellow citizens when it comes to employment. Also, there are laws mandating exclusive Jewish rights to not only land within Israel, but within the Occupied West Bank where many violent and hateful settlers spend their days harassing the Palestinians and making their life a living hell. In fact, due to the illegal settlements, and the illegal Separation Barrier, the Palestinians are currently only allowed access to 40 per cent of the West Bank. their life resembles in many ways, that of the South African Blacks who were denied not only free movement, but a vote in their own nation. It is time for Israel to either incorporate the Palestinians into Israel, or allow them to have their own state in the 22 per cent of the original Palestinian homeland. If Israel wants separation, then why not allow the Palestinians to create a state on that remaining 22 per cent of their originial homeland? Or that is not possible, integrate them into Israel, and have a binational state. Those are your choices. Kornberg, your tired defense of Israeli apartheid is typical, but still amazingly full of crap.
Anonymous
Wed Mar 3 2010 09:32
I would also point out that Israel affords people within its borders more rights than any of the surrounding countries. Women in nearby countries cannot drive, and must cover themselves from head to toe. There is a better case for gender apartheid in these countries than any kind of apartheid in Israel.
Pax R.
Wed Mar 3 2010 00:24
Let's make sure we don't lose sight of the real goal: peace. We are starting the Pax101 evolution on FB and Twitter - @Pax_101. Civil dialogue and respectful debate are the roads to the future.
DH Kornberg, BU Law '03
Tue Mar 2 2010 18:25
There is no apartheid in Israel. Words are important, as ex-Prof. Chomsky, an expert in linguistics, should know. Apartheid is a term that was coined in South Africa to describe not just "a policy of segregation or discrimination on grounds of race,” but an OFFICIAL state policy of racial segregation, enforced by law. There are no laws mandating racial segregation in Israel.
In any case, Palestinians are not a race; Palestinians are Arabs. Arabs who live in Israel have all the legal rights afforded by the state to all its citizens. Indeed, there are Arab members of the Israeli Parliament.
The Arabs who live in territories occupied by Israel in 1967 consider themselves Palestinians and are not citizens of Israel. Indeed, their representatives say that they do not wish to be citizens of Israel, but want their own state. Israel does not give full citizenship rights to non-citizens, any more than any other country does.
Any racial discrimination in Israel is not sanctified by law, but exists on the same basis that it does in the USA.






log out